Share transfer vs. share transmission: what the Companies Act actually requires in 2025

A co-founder wants to sell 20% of his shares to an incoming investor, so the company "transfers" the shares by simply updating a spreadsheet and emailing the new shareholder a PDF certificate. Six months later, a deceased angel investor's son asks the company to put the shares in his name, and the board treats it exactly the same way — a quick entry in the register. Both events have just been mishandled, and in both cases the company has created a defect that surfaces at the worst possible time: during due diligence for the next funding round, or in a family dispute in court.

Transfer and transmission are two legally distinct events. One is a voluntary act between living parties that requires a stamped instrument and (in most private companies) board approval. The other happens by operation of law — death, inheritance, insolvency — and requires no instrument and no stamp duty at all. Confusing them is one of the most common cap-table mistakes Indian private limited companies make, and it is entirely avoidable once you know which rules apply.

What the law actually requires

Both events are governed by Section 56 of the Companies Act, 2013, read with Rule 11 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014, but the procedural requirements diverge sharply.

Share transfer is a voluntary transaction — a sale, gift, or other disposal of shares by an existing member to another person while the transferor is alive and competent. Under Section 56(1), a company cannot register a transfer of shares unless a proper instrument of transfer in Form SH-4, duly stamped, dated and executed by (or on behalf of) both the transferor and the transferee, is delivered to the company. The instrument must specify the name, address and occupation of the transferee and carry the details of the shares being transferred.

The SH-4 must be delivered to the company within 60 days of the date of execution. If it is lost or not delivered in time, the board may register the transfer on terms of indemnity it thinks fit, but the 60-day clock is the default rule founders should plan around.

Crucially, a private company is defined under Section 2(68) as one that restricts the right to transfer its shares. Those restrictions live in the Articles of Association — almost always a right of first refusal (ROFR), pre-emption rights, and a requirement of board approval before any transfer is registered. A transfer executed without honouring the Articles is voidable, and an investor's lawyer will catch it. The instrument is necessary but not sufficient; the contractual gate in the Articles must also be cleared.

Share transmission, by contrast, is the devolution of title by operation of law — it happens automatically on the death, insolvency or lunacy of a member. Under Section 56(2), the company may register a transmission on the basis of intimation supported by appropriate evidence — no Form SH-4 is required and no instrument of transfer is executed, because the transmittee is not a contracting party but a successor or legal representative stepping into the deceased member's shoes.

For transmission, the company relies on documents proving the devolution: a death certificate, a succession certificate, probate of will, letters of administration, or a legal heir certificate depending on the situation, a transmission request form, and usually an indemnity bond and the original share certificates. The legal representative may either elect to be registered as a member or to transfer the shares to another person.

A common trap involves nomination under Section 72. Many founders assume a nominee recorded in Form SH-13 becomes the absolute owner of the shares on death, overriding the will. The Supreme Court settled the contrary position in Shakti Yezdani v. Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar (December 2023), holding that a nominee under the Companies Act holds the shares in trust for the legal heirs and that succession law prevails over nomination. A nominee gets custody and the right to be registered, not ownership against the estate. Companies that hand absolute title to a nominee without regard to succession can be dragged into litigation.

Once either event is validly registered, Section 56(4) requires the company to deliver the share certificate within one month — one month of receipt of the transfer instrument for a transfer, and one month of receipt of the intimation of transmission for a transmission.

Stamp duty: the single biggest practical difference

This is where the two routes part ways most clearly, and where founders lose money or create liability.

A transfer attracts stamp duty. Following the amendment to the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 that took effect on 1 July 2020, the rate on transfer of shares is a uniform 0.015% of the consideration or market value of the shares, under the amended Article 62. The duty is the same across all states because the 2020 amendment centralised collection. For shares held in physical form, the SH-4 must carry share-transfer stamps to that value; for dematerialised shares, the depository (NSDL/CDSL) collects the stamp duty automatically at the time of transfer, so no manual stamping is needed. Stamp duty on a transfer is conventionally borne by the transferor unless the parties agree otherwise.

A transmission attracts no stamp duty. Because the shares devolve by operation of law and there is no instrument of transfer and no consideration, there is nothing to stamp. This is not a loophole — it is the deliberate consequence of the event being involuntary. Treating a transmission as a transfer and paying 0.015% (or, worse, executing an SH-4) introduces a wrong document into the record and can muddy the chain of title.

Worked example: a transfer of 50,000 shares at a fair value of Rs 100 each (Rs 50,00,000) attracts stamp duty of Rs 750 (0.015%). The same 50,000 shares passing to a deceased shareholder's heir attract Rs 0.

Practical implications — what actually goes wrong

When these procedures are ignored, the damage is rarely immediate but almost always expensive:

Penalty under Section 56(6). If a company fails to comply with the procedure for transfer or transmission, the company is liable to a penalty of Rs 25,000 to Rs 5,00,000, and every officer in default is liable to a penalty of Rs 10,000 to Rs 1,00,000. These are not theoretical — they are triggered by failing to issue the certificate within the statutory window or registering a transfer without a valid instrument.

Due-diligence failure. The most common real-world consequence is a funding round or acquisition stalling because the cap table cannot be reconciled. An investor's counsel will ask for the SH-4s, board resolutions approving each transfer, evidence that pre-emption rights were waived, and the stamp-duty proof. A "transfer" done by spreadsheet has none of this, and the company ends up paying lawyers to reconstruct and ratify historical transfers under time pressure.

Defective register of members. The register of members under Section 88 (Form MGT-1) is the company's primary record of ownership. Errors here flow into the annual return MGT-7A filed for small and private companies, and an inconsistent register is exactly the kind of mismatch that MCA21 V3's real-time validation and pre-fill features now surface when annual filings are prepared. With the V2 portal fully decommissioned and all 38 forms live on V3, sloppy member records are harder to paper over than they were.

Disputed transmission. Handing shares to a nominee as absolute owner, ignoring a succession certificate, or registering a legal heir without proper evidence invites a civil suit and an interim injunction freezing the shares — which can in turn block board decisions if those shares carry voting rights.

Step-by-step: what to do

For a share transfer:

• Check the Articles first. Identify any ROFR, pre-emption, or board-approval clause and follow it. Issue offer notices to existing members where required and obtain written waivers.
• Execute Form SH-4. Both transferor and transferee sign; fill in consideration, share details, and transferee particulars. Date it.
• Pay stamp duty at 0.015%. Affix share-transfer stamps for physical shares, or rely on depository collection for demat shares. Keep proof.
• Deliver SH-4 to the company within 60 days of execution, with the original share certificate or allotment letter.
• Pass a board resolution registering the transfer and recording approval under the Articles.
• Update the register of members (MGT-1) and issue the new share certificate within one month (Section 56(4)).

For a share transmission:

• Collect proof of devolution: death certificate, plus succession certificate / probate / letters of administration / legal heir certificate as applicable.
• Obtain the transmission request form, indemnity bond, and original certificates from the legal representative or nominee.
• Do not execute an SH-4 and do not pay stamp duty — neither applies.
• Verify nomination correctly. A Section 72 nominee may be registered, but treat the nominee as holding for the heirs unless the estate is settled; respect any succession certificate.
• Pass a board resolution approving the transmission on the evidence supplied.
• Update MGT-1 and issue the certificate within one month of receiving the intimation.

For a compliance audit of your company, visit pvtltd.co

---

See Also

• Lending Between Your Own Group Companies: Section 185 or Section 186? What the Companies Act Actually Requires
• "We charge our UK parent whatever is convenient": What arm's-length pricing actually requires
• Leaving Form AOC-2 blank: What the Companies Act actually requires for related-party disclosure

Need help with this?

Our team handles the paperwork. You focus on your business.